The Congress of Vienna, Jean Godefroy

Sober Second Thoughts

View PDF full-text

Keith E. Whittington

2 (2016)

Pages 97-116

Abstract

Normative theorizing about judicial review often proceeds with minimal attention to the overall record of how the U.S. Supreme Court has actually exercised the power of judicial review. This article assesses how well the historical record of the Court’s invalidation of federal policies can be justified using only a minimalist theory of judicial review. Although some of the Court’s cases can be justified in this way, most of the Court’s work would require a more substantively thick and necessarily controversial theory in order to justify it.